Profile
Let's look at the advantages and disadvantages of rental and built-in donwload site Let's look at the pros and cons of rental and built-in webhard. Rental webharders include Dacom Webhard, Ucloud, and KT Webhard. This identifies something that shares idc's server resources with other users. Built-in webhard solutions include Internet disks, linkhard, plus disks, ncs, and Ajaxplar. The rental type gets the benefit of having a server on idc, so it doesn't have to be managed separately, and the initial setting cost is low. However, you need to pay monthly maintenance for capacity and traffic, pay for capacity and traffic costs, and move files to other servers. There are disadvantages such as for example dual subscription to internal services (homepages, intranet) along with other domains. Built-in Webhard leverages specific hardware (internal resources) to create services, freeing up capacity and traffic. It gets the burden of initial setting costs. Large companies do not use rental solutions. Webhard is not only a Webhard, it's a company. It is because it is confidential and knows the power of strategic sharing and well-managed data. Link hard solutions have emerged based on the intention that small and medium-sized businesses should build webhard without any burden. It does not have to purchase H/W separately, and the perfect solution is alone allows users to build Webhard by utilizing the required pc, NAS, and server equipment. If you already had a website or intranet, it is possible to stop unnecessary work that used to run the site. OK to create installed blogs or bulletin boards. By increasing utilization through intranet, groupware, kms, and the business's homepage as well as the Webhard's original function, the thought of developing a use-oriented product makes one look forward to the expansion of the perfect solution is. The price can be from 300,000 won for 30 people, which is often fully built in Soho, therefore the parts which were agonizing over setting and maintenance costs will undoubtedly be solved a lot. It is now essential for Soho to establish a web hard system. Rental vs. Construction. Webhard reminds you of an extremely useful and convenient Online sites that allows one to download files over the Internet at a fixed monthly cost. This means that the usage of web hard is becoming common. But it's not just recently that this concept came out, and it's true that it is been a long time. As soon as it came out, many people used it, and there have been many workers in offices who didn't sign up for it or even paid for their personal expenses due to lack of capacity, and there are probably still some now. The biggest background of the phenomenon may be the rapidly growing file capacity of materials such as work used, while there are lots of burdens and inconveniences to cover monthly expenses predicated on limited capacity. Furthermore, the service is provided contrary to the backdrop of a large portal, which also leads to security concerns about the leakage of confidential information, which is why the company won't adopt it. In some cases, there are also many implementations of SI projects that build installation-only webhard that meet up with the needs of users' needs. The deployment of a standalone server includes a server (HW)+ operating-system (Server OS)+ webhard solution (high-priced licenses based on the number of users), that is prohibitive compared to using monthly webhard when maintenance services are included. NAS supplies a highly cost-effective, easy-to-install and easy-to-operate webhard for anybody with significantly decrease the needs of the webhard users. Webhard is quite innovative since it supports uploading files automagically. p2p 순위 It's a excellent feature because DDNS, etc. could be accessed from the outside and never have to buy an authorized IP. Unfortunately, there are functional limitations as the basic webhard contained in these NAS is basic. Because the word "basic" implies, it isn't a webhard solution developed at a higher cost. Therefore, webhard modules for NAS mounts are recently available with the capabilities and peaks of expensive, built-in webhard solutions. Needless to say, it is a paid option, but it is a very low-cost, very helpful solution that's less than a tenth of the cost of building a single server. Now, NAS and Webhard meet to integrate Intranet & Extranet at low cost, developing a small but powerful collaborative file server. I'll take a look at the rough features of Webhard and guide you. You can go over it and choose the right one based on the reality and needs.
Forum Role: Participant
Topics Started: 0
Replies Created: 0